[CCWG-Accountability] Welcome note

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I think the answer lies here:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/2014-December/000123.html

where it clearly states that you are not one of the 5 GAC "members"
but "been appointed as ICG liaison to the CCWG" which from the
context I assume means CCWG-Accountability.

Why don't you take this up with your GAC chair, Mr Schneider?

el


On 2014-12-09 11:45 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear All,
> Sorry my connection was interrupted two times, I repeat
> Dear All
> 
> Most of the thing foreseen to be done are directly related to ICG
> activities .
> I do not understand how the repreventatives of  ICG would be given the
> right to take part in consensus building.The confusion came from the
> message sent by Thomas  in his announcement that  it did not  make it
> clear that I am among the 5 members of GAC ,REPRESTING  ICG.
> There are problems in the whole process.
> I agree with Richard that it is impossible that more than 150 people
> attend a live virtual meeting of one hour.
> I am not aware of the process in CWG but in ICG only the members raise
> hand and ask for the floor.
> I do not see any light at the end of the CCWG Tunnel.
> I need clarification from chair and corrective measures from Thomas to
> announce me as he should have announced it
> Regards
> Kavouss     
> 
[...]