[CCWG-Accountability] Fwd: Op-Ed from The Hill

[Roelof Meijer]

It might. But then, first and foremost, the community is working on the IANA stewardship/oversight transition, not the ICANN oversight transition (though I agree they will probably come together) and definitely not the ICANN transition (whatever that might be) nor the IANA transition (though an organizational separation from ICANN as proposed by some, does „upgrade” the stewardship transition to a „full” IANA transition)

Best regards,

Roelof A. Meijer
CEO

SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM | THE NETHERLANDS
T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 395 775 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05
roelof.meijer at sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer at sidn.nl> | www.sidn.nl<http://www.sidn.nl/>


From: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>>
Date: donderdag 18 december 2014 10:52
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: [CCWG-Accountability] Fwd: Op-Ed from The Hill

This may be of interest.
Jordan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
Date: 18 December 2014 at 01:46
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Op-Ed from The Hill
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>

Here is a link to an Op-Ed that some may find interesting.  It probably more directly relates to the Accountability CCWG but accountability mechanisms like this were put in place overall in ICANN, it could impact our proposed solution.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/227375-icann-transition-plan-needs-new-ideas-to-ensure-accountability

Chuck


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20141219/fb7ec23c/attachment.html>