[CCWG-Accountability] CCWG-Accountability work team 2: draft 5.1

[Alan Greenberg]

I am somewhat troubled by all of the items in WS1 
where I do not see the direct link to the IANA 
transition (even if the IANA transition was 
directly to ICANN without the intervening Contract Co.)

Note I am not saying that they might not be 
perfectly valid and desirable accountability 
mechanism, just that I do not see the direct 
link, and thus perhaps greatly increasing our 
work to be done to allow transition.

I do understand that it may be easier to get some 
of these accepted if done in association with 
WS1, but if we make our WS1 task too all-inclusive, it may not get done at all.

Alan

At 28/12/2014 07:53 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
>Hope all of you are enjoying the holidays.  Work 
>Team 2 has added several ideas and requests that 
>arrived after 21-Dec.  Draft v5.1 is attached, reflecting these changes:
>
>CWG requests: IANA Stewardship CWG co-chairs 
>Jonathan Robinson and Lise Fuhr requested 3 new 
>accountability items in Category 1, Work Stream 
>1.   These 3 items are flagged as CWG (in red and bold)
>
>
>David Johnson: For Category 1, Work Stream 1, 
>proposed a contract between ICANN and Registries 
>& Registrars, with Registrants as 3rd party 
>beneficiaries. Contract lets ICANN impose rules 
>on others only when supported by consensus of 
>affected parties.  Disputes go to independent 
>arbitration panel that could issue binding 
>decisions.  In a discussion with David, we 
>thought the contract could work alongside the 
>Member structure, not instead of it.
>
>
>Izumi Okutani and Athina Fragkouli noted support 
>for four accountability items, but would place 
>them in Work Stream 2 and suggested some wording changes.
>
>Malcolm Hutty requested an item be moved to Work 
>Stream 1: "Ensure that the ICANN Board can be 
>held to its Bylaws, with effective remedy if 
>breach found by independent 
>adjudicator.”     Seun Ojedeji requested an 
>alternative: “found by the community"
>
>Daniel Castro of ITIF and Wisdom Donkor 
>requested Open Data transparency rules, in Category 3, Work Stream 2.
>
>Guru Achayra: For Category 1, Work Stream 1, 
>proposed an Accountability Contract between 
>ICANN and ‘Contract Co.’ to replace the Affirmation of Commitments
>
>Carlos Gutiérrez: requested 4 new prescribed 
>actions in Category 3, Work Stream 2
>
>Apologies if I have missed other 
>suggestions.  Look forward to discussing on our next call.
>
>—
><
>Steve DelBianco
>Executive Director
>NetChoice
><http://www.netchoice.org/>http://www.NetChoice.org 
>and <http://blog.netchoice.org/>http://blog.netchoice.org
>+1.202.420.7482
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20141228/e2ca74dd/attachment.html>