[CCWG-Accountability] CCWG-Accountability work team 2: draft 5.1

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

And that presupposes that the CSG-Stewardship WG won't stick with the
principle of separability in its recommended solution.

If it does stick with separability then a contractual relationship
remains as an ongoing leverage point. In terms of CWG-Stewardship work,
Contract Co holding the contract, still appears to be quite active as a
proposal.

Perhaps we need to look at the WS1 list in terms of the binary
discriminant: is there an ongoing contractual relationship with an
eternal entity or not.  I expect the WS1 list will vary based on which
of these is being considered.

avri


On 28-Dec-14 22:57, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
>
> Of course, in so much as the transition represents a loss of leverage,
> WS1 needs to sufficiently replace it. It’s not really about the IANA
> transition itself so much as the elimination of the contractual
> relationship. I agree with Alan that we need to be disciplined about
> what to include in WS1 to ensure that we come away with the leverage
> to accomplish WS2.
>
>  
>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Alan Greenberg
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 28, 2014 9:35 PM
> *To:* Steve DelBianco; Accountability CCWG
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-Accountability] CCWG-Accountability work team 2:
> draft 5.1
>
>  
>
> I am somewhat troubled by all of the items in WS1 where I do not see
> the direct link to the IANA transition (even if the IANA transition
> was directly to ICANN without the intervening Contract Co.)
>
> Note I am not saying that they might not be perfectly valid and
> desirable accountability mechanism, just that I do not see the direct
> link, and thus perhaps greatly increasing our work to be done to allow
> transition.
>
> I do understand that it may be easier to get some of these accepted if
> done in association with WS1, but if we make our WS1 task too
> all-inclusive, it may not get done at all.
>
> Alan
>
> At 28/12/2014 07:53 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
>
>     Hope all of you are enjoying the holidays.  Work Team 2 has added
>     several ideas and requests that arrived after 21-Dec.  Draft v5.1
>     is attached, reflecting these changes:
>
>     CWG requests: IANA Stewardship CWG co-chairs Jonathan Robinson and
>     Lise Fuhr requested 3 new accountability items in Category 1, Work
>     Stream 1.   These 3 items are flagged as CWG (in red and bold)
>
>      
>
>     David Johnson: For Category 1, Work Stream 1, proposed a contract
>     between ICANN and Registries & Registrars, with Registrants as 3rd
>     party beneficiaries. Contract lets ICANN impose rules on others
>     only when supported by consensus of affected parties.  Disputes go
>     to independent arbitration panel that could issue binding
>     decisions.  In a discussion with David, we thought the contract
>     could work alongside the Member structure, not instead of it.
>
>     Izumi Okutani and Athina Fragkouli noted support for four
>     accountability items, but would place them in Work Stream 2 and
>     suggested some wording changes.
>
>     Malcolm Hutty requested an item be moved to Work Stream 1: "Ensure
>     that the ICANN Board can be held to its Bylaws, with effective
>     remedy if breach found by independent adjudicator.”     Seun
>     Ojedeji requested an alternative: “found by the community"
>
>     Daniel Castro of ITIF and Wisdom Donkor requested Open Data
>     transparency rules, in Category 3, Work Stream 2.
>
>     Guru Achayra: For Category 1, Work Stream 1, proposed an
>     Accountability Contract between ICANN and ‘Contract Co.’ to
>     replace the Affirmation of Commitments
>
>     Carlos Gutiérrez: requested 4 new prescribed actions in Category
>     3, Work Stream 2
>
>     Apologies if I have missed other suggestions.  Look forward to
>     discussing on our next call.
>
>     —
>     <
>     Steve DelBianco
>     Executive Director
>     NetChoice
>     http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/> and
>     http://blog.netchoice.org <http://blog.netchoice.org/>
>     +1.202.420.7482
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20141229/ebe02faa/attachment.html>