[CCWG-Accountability] Notes & Action Items from CCWG Call on 23 December

Tue Dec 30 16:53:19 UTC 2014

Dear Tijani,

Many thanks for your detailed input.

Your point regarding the formalities to engage with Advisors is well 
noted. The intent is only to formalize the process by which the CCWG 
formally requests Advice on a certain matter, but by all means Advisors 
are Participants to the group and that should not restrict interactions 
with them.

We are trying to engage with Advisors to get their feedback on the topic 
as well, and a revised version will be presented for approval when that 
is completed. I'll make sure this point is conveyed to them.

Talk to you later I hope,
Mathieu

Le 30/12/2014 15:18, Tijani BEN JEMAA a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> First of all, I apologize again for being prevented from attending the 
> last call. It was out of my control.
>
> I received the call output sent by grace and listened to the adobe 
> recording.
>
> ·There was a deep silence during the period of report from Avri (WA 3) 
> and Eric (WA 4) on the adobe recording. There is nothing related to 
> those 2 work areas on the wiki.
>
> oWhy the voice was removed on the adobe recording? Was it intended?
>
> oWhy WA 3 and 4 didn’t have material on the wiki as it was for WA 1 and 2?
>
> I found the rules for engagement with advisors pretty good, except 
> that I find the procedure described in Page 3 of the presentation too 
> formal. My understanding is that those advisors will integrate the 
> CCWG and attend all meetings where everything is recorded. So why we 
> need a so formal procedure for asking for advise and why we need a 
> point of contact for clarification, etc. It gives me the impression 
> that they will be in a closed office, and we deal with them through 
> interfaces.
>
> _Work Area 1_: the table is exhaustive; nevertheless, I have the 
> following remarks:
>
> ·Advisory Mechanism:
>
> oSSAC:  How can the ICANN community accountable to SSAC?
>
> oRSSAC: same remark: how can the ICANN Community to RSSAC?
>
> ·Contractual requirements:
>
> oRegistry & registrar agreements: I believe that the 
> registries/registrars are accountable to ICANN (add ICANN to the 
> column “to whom”)
>
> ·I agree with Bladel that a column should be added where we 
> indicate whether each existing mechanism is worth keeping or not in future?
>
> _Work Area 2_:
>
> ·While I am a strong supporter of human rights, I want it to be 
> Chrystal clear that any aspect of human right related to the Internet 
> content can not apply here because ICANN is not about content at all. 
> All other human rights that are not related to content can be included 
> in the public interest in my PoV. That’s why I don’t agree on 
> replacing “in the public interest” by for protection and advance of 
> human rights and Internet Freedoms”.
>
> ·The Ombudsman is an internal trusted intermediary and all his work 
> should remain internal.
>
> ·Why ICANN should remain subject to US Law?
>
> ·I don’t know who is transparency International, and if they are so 
> exceptional in auditing, why they don’t do so for the other ICANN 
> components such as the Board?
>
> Those are few remarks. I would like to thank the Working Areas 1 & 2 
> leaders for the wonderful work they did.
>
> See you today on the call
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Executive Director
>
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>
> Phone: + 216 41 649 605
>
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>
> Fax: + 216 70 853 376
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *De :*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *De la part 
> de* Grace Abuhamad
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 24 décembre 2014 12:55
> *À :* Accountability Cross Community
> *Cc :* Brenda Brewer
> *Objet :* [CCWG-Accountability] Notes & Action Items from CCWG Call on 
> 23 December
>
> Dear all,
>
> The notes, transcripts, and recordings for the CCWG-Accountability 
> (Meeting #3) call on 23 December are available on the Wiki here: 
> https://community.icann.org/x/O4cQAw. The documents presented are also 
> uploaded on the Wiki but I have reattached them here for your 
> convenience.
>
> Also, here is a summary of the action items:
>
>   * *ACTION:* contact Grace if you still have not received an account or uploaded your SOI
>   * *ACTION - WA1:* DIDP to be added to table per Doria's suggestion
>   * *ACTION -
>     WA2:* Doria to cross check the document and add recommendations from ATRT1 and ATRT2
>   * *ACTION -
>     WA2:* Add a column to flag what has been requested by other communities and specifically the 3 items that were requested by the CWG.
>   * *ACTION - WA4:* Staff to post comments of EBW and JB to Wiki page
>   * *ACTION -
>     WA4:* All should provide input in contingencies so they can be considered.
>   * *ACTION:* Staff to prepare a more detailed timeline
>
> The next call is on *Tuesday 30 December at 19:00 UTC*. For a full 
> list of upcoming meetings, please see: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Meetings
>
> Best,
>
> Grace
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <http://www.avast.com/> 	
>
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel 
> malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! 
> <http://www.avast.com/> est active.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20141230/e0fc5f10/attachment.html>