[CCWG-ACCT] Objection to our present work planning
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 11:28:10 UTC 2015
I doubt that it will be all that difficult. It should be fairly clear what
the CWG is relying on the CCWG to deliver in order to directly support the
CWG's proposals. Furthermor, the CWG is commencing a 2-day high-intensity
work period, with 3 2-hour calls per day. That, in itself, should help
clarify the WS1A list, and the CCWG co-chairs have asked the CWG to take
note of these "dependencies" as the work period unfolds, and to compile as
specific a list of these as possible.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> you have a way with words :-)-O
> But, I am not sure the Co-Chairs are getting it.
> On 2015-04-13 09:44 , Roelof Meijer wrote:
> > Not intending to be cynical, but I wonder if enough of the work
> > would go to WS1b to make up for the time we would spend on
> > discussing what should be in WS1a and what in WS1b..
> > Best,
> > Roelof
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community