[CCWG-ACCT] Objection to our present work planning
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.na
Mon Apr 13 14:06:18 UTC 2015
never mind finding the time to just be on 3 calls a day (?!?!) how can one think any of this and the implications through?
I could not...
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5c
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:28, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I doubt that it will be all that difficult. It should be fairly clear what the CWG is relying on the CCWG to deliver in order to directly support the CWG's proposals. Furthermor, the CWG is commencing a 2-day high-intensity work period, with 3 2-hour calls per day. That, in itself, should help clarify the WS1A list, and the CCWG co-chairs have asked the CWG to take note of these "dependencies" as the work period unfolds, and to compile as specific a list of these as possible.
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> you have a way with words :-)-O
>> But, I am not sure the Co-Chairs are getting it.
>> On 2015-04-13 09:44 , Roelof Meijer wrote:
>> > Not intending to be cynical, but I wonder if enough of the work
>> > would go to WS1b to make up for the time we would spend on
>> > discussing what should be in WS1a and what in WS1b..
>> > Best,
>> > Roelof
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community