[CCWG-ACCT] Further Objection to the Methodology
Dr Eberhard Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Apr 14 12:42:18 UTC 2015
this is not directed against an individual or a group of individuals
(inside the CCWG).
I can not participate in a meaningful deliberation on this unless I
have time to properly review this document, not just being fed a
large number of busy slides.
Never mind "decision".
There are some content issues (for example with regards to
membership as far as ccTLDs are concerned) which flashed by.
This the wrong way of dealing with this, and I renew my objection for
On 2015-04-14 13:29, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
> Dear Eberhard,
> The slides were sent to everyone as soon as we got them.
> I remind you that no substantial decision is made on any single
> call so you don’t have to worry on having to decide on anything
> on this call. We make second readings on substantial issues.
> Best regards,
>> El 14/04/2015, a las 7:25, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA>
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>> Why have the slides of the law firm not been sent to us early
>> enough to consider them, prior to being presented and discussed?
>> Never mind decision making.
>> I object to this.
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421 \ /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community