[CCWG-ACCT] Quality of our proposal will suffer from this pace that leaves no time for consideration and meaningful evaluation
kdrazek at verisign.com
Tue Apr 14 13:30:00 UTC 2015
I believe the contract WILL be extended.
I agree content and getting accountability right is paramount.
I also believe there is a limited window of opportunity to secure a transition.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> It is a FUNDAMENTAL issue, are we approaching this right or wrong?
> I think we did this wrong right from the start, and are doing this
> wrong. If we are getting this wrong, a transition would not achieve what
> we all want.
> There is no deadline which would make the transition fail, they will
> just extend the contract.
> We must not sacrifice content, under ANY circumstances.
>> On 2015-04-14 13:39, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>> I am strongly in support of getting accountability reforms
>> "right," but I'm also sensitive to a possibly limited window of
>> opportunity to secure a transition of IANA stewardship.
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421 \ /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community