[CCWG-ACCT] Quality of our proposal will suffer from this pace that leaves no time for consideration and meaningful evaluation
robin at ipjustice.org
Tue Apr 14 14:44:29 UTC 2015
It is important to remember that the transition does not happen until we are done. That is the order of events. Not the other way around. We are not rushing to meet someone else's deadline because the transition cannot occur until we've got consensus and approval of the changes that must be made before it can occur. Sometimes we forget that we are the driving force in this timeline. Sometimes we think that we must rush to meet these dates, but that isn't how this process has actually been set up. I agree we need to continue to work quickly, but not because there is a limited window in the next 2 weeks to come up a proposal, but because we have a window in the next 4-6 months, and we should take that time to get it right.
On Apr 14, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
> I believe the contract WILL be extended.
> I agree content and getting accountability right is paramount.
> I also believe there is a limited window of opportunity to secure a transition.
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>> It is a FUNDAMENTAL issue, are we approaching this right or wrong?
>> I think we did this wrong right from the start, and are doing this
>> wrong. If we are getting this wrong, a transition would not achieve what
>> we all want.
>> There is no deadline which would make the transition fail, they will
>> just extend the contract.
>> We must not sacrifice content, under ANY circumstances.
>>> On 2015-04-14 13:39, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>>> I am strongly in support of getting accountability reforms
>>> "right," but I'm also sensitive to a possibly limited window of
>>> opportunity to secure a transition of IANA stewardship.
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421 \ /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community