[CCWG-ACCT] Further Objection to the Methodology

Dr Eberhard Lisse el at lisse.NA
Wed Apr 15 14:56:44 UTC 2015


I grant you, I like to formulate pointedly :-)-O


On 2015-04-15 15:27, Steve Crocker wrote:
> El,
> Your characterization of the due diligence process for delegations
> and re-delegations is inaccurate.  The Board pays close attention
> to each and every one of these actions.  Over time, a process has
> evolved which puts the majority of the burden on the staff,
> thereby resulting in checklist, but the Board does not blindly
> accept the paperwork and has pushed back or questioned the action
> if there is anything that appears amiss.
> That said, the Board does want to be in the position of making
> primary decisions about delegations and re-delegations, nor should
> it be.  We need a more robust process.  The Framework of
> Interpretation is one positive step in that direction.
> Steve Crocker
> Chair, ICANN Board of Directors

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list