[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Comments and questions on legal docs
Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl
Thu Apr 16 10:05:00 UTC 2015
If you were (s)elected by the ccNSO to represent us in this body, yes, I
would. But of course only on those issues now also (rightfully) decided
through „the ICANN mechanisms"
On 15-04-15 12:21, "Dr Eberhard Lisse" <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>How does this solve the ccTLD issue?
>Will you let me make decisions that affect SIDN as the .NL ccTLD Manager?
>Most assuredly not I would think.
>On 2015-04-15 11:04, Roelof Meijer wrote:
>> I am not a lawyer either. But I think that a lot of issues
>> Samantha identifies are resolved if there’s only one member: a
>> single legal entity containing the stakeholders roughly as in the
>> „Community Council” or „permanent CCWG” proposals. The
>> constituencies represented in the single member, won’t have to
>> become legal entities themselves. And we won’t have to add or
>> remove members when we gain new insights as to what stakeholders
>> should be represented, they would just be added to/removed from
>> the group forming the single member.
>> Maybe this single member should itself be an association?
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community