[CCWG-ACCT] Frozen Draft Report
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
Mon Apr 20 14:46:39 UTC 2015
If I am not mistaken you are already part of the legal sub-team through its mailing list. If that is not the case, I will be glad to ask staff to have you subscribed to the list.
> El 20/04/2015, a las 9:12, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> escribió:
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> I remain confused by Thomas' advice.
> From the charter:
> The Chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each
> position as having one of the following designations:
> a) Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees;
> identified by an absence of objection
> b) Consensus - a position where a small minority disagrees,
> but most agree
> I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam what
> EACH POSITION means.
> [...] In the absence of Full Consensus, the Chair(s) should
> allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) and these,
> along with the consensus view, shall be included in the
> report. [...]
> I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam whether
> an interim report is a report.
> Oh, this reminds me, I want to join the Legal SubTeam.
> greetings, el
> On 2015-04-20 14:54, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>> Dear Eberhard,
>> it is not foreseen in our charter to have minority views for other
>> scenarios than the consensus recommendations. I suggest you use the
>> public comment period to voice your concerns or indicate your preference
>> where our report is providing options as I am sure many of the
>> colleagues in the CCWG and their respective groups will do.
>> rickert.net <http://rickert.net>
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421 \ /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community