[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Fwd: Legal question
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 05:40:44 UTC 2015
Dear All,
The questions are valid and answer to one Q is addressed in the other question.
Yes the Qs are not difficult to answer
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 06:55, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi León,
>
> Really? They are fairly simple questions. As I said, I can ask them on the call.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>> On 21 Apr 2015, at 14:32 , León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Greg,
>>
>> I just want to note that for the short notice it is unlikely we will be able to have answers to feed the discussion in our call tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> León
>>
>>> El 20/04/2015, a las 23:22, List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam <ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org> escribió:
>>>
>>> I am forwarding Chris Disspain's email into the Legal Sub Team for further consideration. I will let our counsels respond, should the Legal Sub Team's discussion result in a referral of the questions to counsel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Greg Shatan
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au>
>>> Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:03 AM
>>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Legal question
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I’m not sure if this email should be addressed to the whole group, the legal sub-team or some other. Anyway, I have some questions that I would appreciate answers to from the CCWG’s lawyers. Happy to discuss on the upcoming CCWG call.
>>>
>>> Under the current structure of ICANN and its SOs and ACs
>>>
>>> 1. Is it correct that a bylaw saying that a combination of those SOs and ACs can veto the budget or veto a bylaw change can be drafted and put in to the bylaws?
>>>
>>> 2. Is it correct that were there to be such a bylaw and the SOs and ACs were to veto the budget or a bylaw change pursuant to that bylaw then the Board of ICANN could ignore that veto and that the SOs and ACs could not enforce the veto?
>>>
>>> 3. Is it correct that the veto bylaw could be drafted to require binding arbitration in the event that the Board refused to follow the SO/AC veto and if so would the Board be bound by the arbitration finding?
>>>
>>> 4. Is it correct that a Board spill bylaw could be inserted in to the bylaws and if triggered would be enforceable?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 18 Apr 2015, at 14:50 , León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> I am forwarding this document from Counsel for your records and for its relevance for our overall work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> León
>>>>
>>>>> Inicio del mensaje reenviado:
>>>>>
>>>>> Para: "ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org" <ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org>
>>>>> Fecha: 17 de abril de 2015 22:21:36 GMT-5
>>>>> De: List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam <ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org>
>>>>> Asunto: [Acct-Legal] (no subject)
>>>>> Responder a: ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Legal Sub-Team, Attached please find revisions to the chart comparing the member and designator approaches from Sidley and Adler & Colvin as requested. Please note that in our cover memo we have posed several questions for your consideration. We have also provided a discussion of some considerations regarding implementation of both approaches. We are look forward to discussing with CCWG next week. Kind regards, Holly
>>>>>
>>>>> HOLLY J. GREGORY
>>>>> Partner
>>>>>
>>>>> Sidley Austin LLP
>>>>> +1.212.839.5853
>>>>> holly.gregory at sidley.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
>>>>> immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>> <Legal Assessment_ Governance Chart.pdf>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
>>>>> Ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
>>> Ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150421/47cc617d/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list