[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: [CCWG-Advisors] jan comments on 17 april ccwg materials

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Dear Co-Chairs,

would you please point out to Mr Gannon, that we are not all on an
equal footing here.  We are from different chartering organizations
in the first place.

But then is also quite expected tactics to accuse of something which
has not been done ("denigration of efforts", "interference") to
detract from criticism of issues.

Do describe this mess as a success is also quite revealing, but then I
have noted my dislike already previously.

greetings, el

On 2015-04-21 11:11, James Gannon wrote:
> Agreed I think that the public comment period is going to be very
> important.  We need to make sure that we really have time and
> effort put into examining the comments from outside the ICANN
> world.  Without that level of assurance that we are looking for
> ‘validation’ from the greater community I feel that we may run
> afoul of our own success.  We need to show not only that we have
> solicited input but that we have taken that input seriously and
> considered its merits on an even playing field with internal
> comments.
> 
> Also I would note my dislike of some of the comments on the list
> about what some members see as the interference of non-appointed
> participants in the work of the CCWG, lets all remember that
> everyone here is on an equal footing in all matters until we come
> to the point of a consensus call.  There are participants doing
> some great work on both work streams and lets not denigrate their
> efforts.
> 
> This goes for the work of the CWG also of course.
> 
> James
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/