[CCWG-ACCT] Frozen Draft Report

[Thomas Rickert]

Dear Eberhard, all,
for the sake of clarity I have pasted my e-mail sent to the list yesterday below:

***
Dear Kavouss,
we will make unambiguously clear that we are not presenting a consensus position but that we are soliciting input from the community with this report we are currently preparing. Even more so, the report will likely present different options that have been discussed in the CCWG or in sub-teams, which makes it clear that the group has not made its conclusions yet. 

Kind regards,
Thomas
***

Rest assured we will stick to this.

Best,
Thomas

---
rickert.net


> Am 21.04.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
> 
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
> Though I stand my ground here, I find Mr Arasteh's suggestion
> helpful.
> 
> greetings, el
> 
>> On 2015-04-21 10:49, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> Dear Thomas
>> Thank you in confirming that the minority position could be
>> reflected in the report
>> Whatt you are saying is ,at this stage, we are not formulating any
>> consensus on any issue.  Just we are submitting a preliminary
>> output on which there is been no attempt for consensus .Then THIS
>> NON Consensus status of the document SHOULD BE EXPLICITLY
>> REFLECTED IN THE DOCUMENT SENT FOR PUBKLIC COMMENT.
>> Regrads
>> Kavouss
>> 
>> 2015-04-21 10:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de
>> <mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de>>:
>> 
>>    Dear Kavouss and Eberhard,
>>    the e-mails that have been exchanged on this all need to be read in
>>    context. In summary:
>> 
>>    - There will be the opportunity to file minority statements when the
>>    CCWG publishes consensus recommendations it has worked on.
>> 
>>    - The CCWG is now in a phase where interim findings will be
>>    presented to the community for input. These are not consensus
>>    recommendations. The chairs have not determined the consensus level
>>    in the group.
>> 
>>    - In the absence of a consensus determination, the rules of the
>>    Charter are not applicable at this stage.
>> 
>>    I hope this clarifies the situation.
>> 
>>    Thomas
>> 
>>    ---
>>    rickert.net <http://rickert.net>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150421/5a7957eb/attachment.html>