[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Accountability questions to law firms

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 21:21:44 UTC 2015


Dear Co-Chairs,

I would also like to express my support for Mr. Drazek's comments.

Best regards,

Greg Shatan

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
wrote:

> Can the Co-Chairs please express my support for Mr Drazek's comments below?
> Let us focus on the work at hand and let us try to get the most out of the
> intensive work sessions for those able to make it.
>
> James Gannon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek,
> Keith
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:55 PM
> To: CCWG Accountability
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Accountability questions to law firms
>
> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> Am I not remembering correctly that the question posed by our colleague
> was previously determined to be out of scope for this CCWG? I believe I saw
> an email on 15 April to that effect. I also don't believe I've seen anyone
> else support the request, and certainly not prioritize it for WS1. Frankly,
> it appears to be more of a CWG and not a CCWG issue, if it's a WG issue at
> all.
>
> If my above recollection is accurate, I respectfully suggest the Co-Chairs
> advise our colleague that continued and repeated interventions on this
> subject are not constructive and are becoming a distraction from the
> otherwise good work of the CCWG.
>
> Further, repeated objections to the pace and intensity of our work are not
> necessary. The objection has been noted more than once. Yes...we have noted
> our colleague is objecting to the frequency and intensity of work sessions
> and therefore electing to not participate. He is not apologizing for his
> inability to attend our work sessions. Noted.
>
> Finally, our colleague's repeated references to alleged conspiracies and
> consistently negative perspectives concerning our bottom-up,
> community-based process are, in my view, inconsistent with the collegial
> and constructive efforts of the CCWG as a whole as exhibited by every other
> member, participant and observer. Frankly, I feel these suggestions are
> approaching an insult to our multi-stakeholder process and to the
> dedication and hard work of the rest of us.
>
> I'm not sure anything can be done about this, but I wanted to express my
> views through the Co-Chairs...since it is never wrong to do so.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Keith
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 23, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Co-Chairs,
> >
> > why is every question, no matter how trivial, assigned, but the
> > fundamental one(s), namely whether the USG in fact has any claim to
> > the root and how this would affect the Transition, if any, and
> > (indvidual) ccTLD Managers (in chronological batches), is not?
> >
> > It's not only a rhetorical question.  Though, I have an idea, which I
> > had voiced before the start of the actual work of the CCWG to some
> > colleagues, due to past experiences.
> >
> > Please have a response ready in time so I can include it into my
> > minority viewpoints that you will have to attach the the Request for
> > Comments.
> >
> > greetings, el
> > --
> > Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> > el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> > PO Box 8421             \     /
> > Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150423/744570fd/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list