[CCWG-ACCT] Nomcom as a UA - legal question
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 22:54:47 UTC 2015
I am forwarding your question to the Legal Sub Team list.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> I am confused as to how this works. Please forgive my questions. This
> has less to do with the proposal I made then with trying to understand the
> nature of a UA. I had not realized until yesterday that the membership
> model was as popular as it has been defined to be. I had also not realized
> that we were down to membership or designator model as our only choices
> until today.
> What qualifies the Nomcom as an association? It can't be the people, as
> there is no continuity, except among the staff. and some overlap in chairs
> as last year's chair, this years' chair and next year's possible chair,
> sit togehter each year. I guess that is a bit of natural person
> continuity. Is that chair thread significant?
> Or is that it is always formed according to same bylaw, even if all of the
> people are different, that is a qualifying mark? Is being a differnt
> instantiation of the same process sufficient to define a UA, even if there
> is no continuity of natural persons?
> Note: I would have sent this to the legal list, but i never managed to get
> subscribed that one as far as I can tell.
> [image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community