[CCWG-ACCT] Suggestion about decription of requirements identified by CWG-Stewardship
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.na
Sat Apr 25 09:50:03 UTC 2015
And we need a Consensus Call, and the (my) minority viewpoint must be attached as per the Charter.
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On Apr 25, 2015, at 09:39, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
> Looks like a very useful idea.
> Jorge Cancio
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>> Am 25.04.2015 um 00:33 schrieb Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:
>> Dear all,
>> I found the meetings in the past two days extremely helpful in setting directions on points which needed confirmation of support (or no support) by CCWG members. That was great.
>> Before I offload my head from ICANN Accountability issues over the weekend, I would like to raise one point here on the mailing list, which I suggested on the chat at one of the calls on Thursday 23 April.
>> For the mechanisms we are proposing for WP1 and WP2, may I suggest to reflect in our proposal for the public comments, the mechanisms identified as requirements in CWG-Stewardship?
>> I would think it is not complicated, if we add a sub-section such as "Requirements identified by CWG" in Section "5. Input Gathered from the Community - Required Community Powers", and refer to specific mechanisms in WS1 and WS2 which correspond to CWG requirements, for example.
>> This would:
>> - Make our considerations for requirements look more comprehensive, in addition to the requirements identified through the public comments which is already in the current draft of our proposal.
>> - Helps the readers to have a better understanding on why this particular mechanism is needed and how it helps, when considering their feedback.
>> - Gives more concrete assurance to CWG-Stewardship members that CCWG are addressing their requirements in a publicly visible form.
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community