[CCWG-ACCT] Legal question

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

How does the bottom-up imperative for SO/AC figure into the drive for
standardization?  Each of the SOC/AC is diffeent according to its own
bottom-up priorities, why wouldn't their legal persona also be self
directed?

And if the legal persona can be constrained, is this done as an ICANN
Board issue or a Members issue.

avri

On 29-Apr-15 21:06, Jordan Carter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 30 April 2015 at 12:44, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au
> <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:
>
>     León,
>
>     Thanks! 
>
>     I appreciate that each SO/AC could set its own controls over its
>     ‘alter ego’ and so the question would be more how will any control
>     mechanisms be enforced.
>
>     However, I imagine that it may also be important to each SO/AC to
>     ensure that their fellow SOs and ACs have robust control
>     mechanisms in place.
>
>
> I strongly agree with this. I think there should be common
> requirements across the SOs/ACs so we don't end up with a hodge podge
> or low standards for exercising some of these powers.
>
> What do others think?
>
> J 
>
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> /A better world through a better Internet /
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150429/a9738848/attachment.html>