[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document

Barrack Otieno otieno.barrack at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 05:05:57 UTC 2015

In support of Alan Greenbergs observation.

Best Regards

On 4/30/15, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>>  I have a real problem with this.
>> There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and
>> influential
>> component since its inception, but it is similarly true that governments
>> and users (albeit in varying models) have been an integral component of
>> ICANN. Our roles may be different, but our roots go as deep, and the
>> import
>> of the public interest in ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the
>> carpet.
>> Alan
>> At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>> As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for various parts
>> of the draft public comment document.
>> *Section *p. 54 add to end of (f):
>> "It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN
>> *and
>> in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector*."

Barrack O. Otieno
Skype: barrack.otieno

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list