[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document
otieno.barrack at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 05:05:57 UTC 2015
In support of Alan Greenbergs observation.
On 4/30/15, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> I have a real problem with this.
>> There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and
>> component since its inception, but it is similarly true that governments
>> and users (albeit in varying models) have been an integral component of
>> ICANN. Our roles may be different, but our roots go as deep, and the
>> of the public interest in ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the
>> At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>> As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for various parts
>> of the draft public comment document.
>> *Section 188.8.131.52 *p. 54 add to end of (f):
>> "It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN
>> in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector*."
Barrack O. Otieno
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community