[CCWG-ACCT] NomCom 6.6.5.g.2
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Apr 30 07:08:34 UTC 2015
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On April 30, 2015 2:55:21 AM EDT, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
>Thanks for this and for the chat on the adobe room.
>I propose rewording this as follows:
>*Alternatively, a special committee of the NomCom could be established
>deal with removal petitions when they arise. The composition of such a
>special committee has not been determined, and input is welcome.*
>On 30 April 2015 at 16:40, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> This section currently reads:
>> Alternatively, a special committee of the NomCom could be
>> deal with removal petitions when they arise. Such a "Recall
>> would have as chair a previous NomCom Chair and would otherwise be
>> formulated on the same basis as the regular NomCom. Either option is
>> legally viable.
>> As mentioned by both Cheryl and I, the implications of "and would
>> otherwise be formulated on the same basis as the regular NomCom" are
>> and likely not what this group really needs. I would strongly suggest
>> the phrase be omitted. We could either defer the details of this
>> alternative until after the public comment (and perhaps ask for
>> defer it until WS2.
>> Also as noted, the sentence "Either option is legally viable."
>> both options 1 and 2 and should be the 2nd sentence of the base item
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community