[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document
mshears at cdt.org
Thu Apr 30 07:35:08 UTC 2015
what is the rationale for the proposed additional text? is it really
On 4/30/2015 5:56 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
> I have a real problem with this.
> There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and
> influential component since its inception, but it is similarly
> true that governments and users (albeit in varying models) have
> been an integral component of ICANN. Our roles may be different,
> but our roots go as deep, and the import of the public interest in
> ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the carpet.
> At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>> As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for
>> various parts of the draft public comment document.
>> *_Section 126.96.36.199
>> _*p. 54 add to end of (f):
>> "It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure
>> of ICANN */and in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector/*."
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community