[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document

[Matthew Shears]

what is the rationale for the proposed additional text?  is it really 
necessary?

On 4/30/2015 5:56 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?
>
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
>
>     I have a real problem with this.
>
>     There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and
>     influential component since its inception, but it is similarly
>     true that governments and users (albeit in varying models) have
>     been an integral component of ICANN. Our roles may be different,
>     but our roots go as deep, and the import of the public interest in
>     ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the carpet.
>
>     Alan
>
>     At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>>     As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for
>>     various parts of the draft public comment document.
>>
>>     *_Section 6.6.1.2
>>     _*p. 54 add to end of (f):
>>     "It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure
>>     of ICANN */and in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector/*."
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150430/dec47194/attachment.html>