[CCWG-ACCT] Minority statements inclusion in report

[Nigel Roberts]

I am deeply disturbed.

The CCWG has recently formally issued its Third Draft Proposal.

If this was anything like a Structure Plan review or other formal public 
consultation in the UK,  this would be close to its final form.

Yet clearly, NOT EVEN THE MEMBERS AND PARTICPANTS know what it is we are 
proposing.

This does not work.




On 12/01/2015 12:41 PM, David Post wrote:
 > revoke domains based upon conduct or content in a manner inconsistent
 > with the Mission Statement limitations - WHAT DOES IT MEAN?  Why has
 > that language been included in the Report, and what is it intended to
 > accomplish??
 >