[CCWG-ACCT] Board plans for considering the 3rd draft report

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Bruce,

As you know there are two webinars organized by CCWG.

I understand that ICANN wishes to have its own calls or webinars on the
same subject.

I do not really understand the objectives of these ICANN calls / webinars

Is a competition with CCWG webinars being organized?

Does it have different objectives than those aimed at CCWG two webinars?

Does the Board have a new issue to raise which have not already been
raised? thus creating an environment of distrusts between the two entities
I draw your attention that the public are the same .

Perhaps ICANN presenters want to say different things that they already
said by Thomas today.

Perhaps ICANN Board wishes to have a surprise for the community?

In my humble  view , as an active participant at CCWG ,Thomas Ricker and
other CCWG Team Teasers  introductory remarks which lasts about 30 mints
were quite valid, constructive, clear, positive and explanatory.

It would be confusing and misleading if ICANN say something different.

We need to work together and minimize the overlapping presentations, in
particular seriously avoid disputing directly or indirectly what CCWG did
say or prepared .

I am still confused by the objectives and purposes of these calls

I seriously warn ICANN Board or whoever presenting the calls to avoid
creating conflicts between CCWG and ICANN.

While ICANN is independent from CCWG and free to say whatever, it deems
necessary to say, however, any contrary views  or contradictory opinion or
any new issues which has never been raised to CCWG ,apart from
understanding of ICANN on how the CCWG  recommendations will be applied,
are totally counterproductive , and could mislead the community.

The Board has been actively participated in every and all  steps of the
works  as contained in the third CCWG proposal and thus expected to enforce
the hard works  which have been carried out during the last 12/ 13 months

I have always supported the Board and its legitimate rights and valuable
contributions so far given. However, at this late stage of the process , it
would be , counterproductive, misleading ,confusing and perhaps dangerous,
if new idea or new elements not previously raised  be presented at these
call or if the presentations cast doubt on the value, workability,
effectiveness, and legality of the third  CCWG proposals .

I knew some Board, s member and their attitudes and standards when
attending CCWG as participants and their views  when talking as the Board
Members

We have taken all issues raised by the Board and expect productive,
positive, constructive views rather than any dividing views.

I hope that the distinguished Board Members will take this advice into
account  and contribute toward  galvanizing and promoting the consensus
already emerged

Regards

Kavouss

2015-12-02 16:52 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:

> Thank you very much Bruce,
>
> In addition to this message, I want to mention that the co chairs have
> been invited to brief the Board during the first 30-40 minutes of the call
> on Friday 4 Dec.
>
> As part of the outreach effort on our Report, we have accepted the invite
> and will obviously rely on the Draft Report and webinar material.
>
> Best regards,
> Mathieu
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de
> Bruce Tonkin
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 décembre 2015 08:59
> À : accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] Board plans for considering the 3rd draft report
>
> Hello All,
>
> For information, the Board is planning two information calls to discuss
> the CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
> released on 30 Nov.
>
> The first of these calls with be on Friday 4 Dec at 21:00 UTC.
>
> The second call will be next week on Thursday 10 Dec.
>
> We are expecting to get comments to the CCWG before the close of the
> public comment period.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151202/9b03ddc0/attachment.html>