[CCWG-ACCT] Issues with Providing Public Comments on CCWG-Accountability Proposal

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Grec

Thank you very much for the message.

Pls advise what you really proposed to be done.

Do you propose that apart from Chartering organizations other entities
should also APPROVE the  CCWG recommendations?

How you came to that conclusions that putting chartering organizations at
the same footing as a particular entities among those you have referred to?

Are you proposing amendments to the CCWG charter?

Can we really make such amendments now?
What is your concrete proposal which could be considered without having or
crating conflicts with the charter?

Please be specific.

It is good to raise questions and difficulties but it is more good to
propose solutions.

Regards

Kavouss



2015-12-02 19:55 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:

> I totally agree.
>
> How can the SOs make any reasonsed decision without having the necessity
> of taking into account the submitted comments when the comment period has
> closed.
>
> And I shall say so, in the ccNSO.
>
>
>
> On 12/02/2015 06:46 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> We should have a complete and open public comment period, and then allow
>> the chartering orgs to make up their mind. To my mind, that should be
>> sequential rather than simultaneous, otherwise doubts could be raised
>> about whether the public comment is meaningful.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151202/451f3198/attachment.html>