[CCWG-ACCT] Issues with Providing Public Comments on CCWG-Accountability Proposal
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Thu Dec 3 15:30:09 UTC 2015
I am not sure I agree fully agree (I am in favor of a Public Comment
whereas you seem to be against it) , but what we all should agree on is
that if we do a Public Comment we do it right.
el
On 2015-12-03 16:45, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
> I agree completely and according to our charter, we are at the point
> in our PROCESS where we take our proposal to the chartering
> organizations. It is only weak mindedness on our part that has led
> to any public comment at this juncture and we run the risk of
> letting the tail wag the dog, so to speak, thereby derailing our
> PROCESS.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:07 AM
> To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Cc: directors at omadhina.net
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Issues with Providing Public Comments on CCWG-Accountability Proposal
>
> Process matters.
>
> el
>
[...[
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list