[CCWG-ACCT] An Inadvertent Omission in Annex 5 - Mission Statement
Greg Shatan
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 15:38:21 UTC 2015
Can staff go back and look at the history of this (in both published and
internal versions)?
This may be a case where the rule "assume nothing" should apply.
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2015 14:40, David Post wrote:
> > I think we're all in agreement that it's the openness, stabiity, etc. of
> > the DNS. So we should say that directly, adding the words "of the DNS"
> > at the end.
>
> Are we?
>
> The NTIA transition requirements specify the need to maintain the
> "security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS" but the
> "openness of the Internet."
>
> --
> Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
> Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
> London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>
> London Internet Exchange Ltd
> Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>
> Company Registered in England No. 3137929
> Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <javascript:;>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151208/45615979/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list