[CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract

[Rosemary E. Fei]

How large is the universe of existing PICs?  Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?

Rosemary

Rosemary E. Fei
Adler & Colvin
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
San Francisco, CA 94104
415/421-7555 (phone)
415/421-0712 (fax)
rfei at adlercolvin.com
www.adlercolvin.com



_____________________________
Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.

From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm at linx.net]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Holly Gregory
Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff at icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract



On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com<mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>> wrote:
We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included.  Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?

And therein lies the rub.

I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151211/0dda0cba/attachment.html>