[CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Rosemary,
Dear Leon
Dear All,
Before certifying question to be 
studied , one need to verify the 
practicality and workability of the 
study.
Issue 1 
How many PICs have been 
received? Perhaps some 500
Issue 2
How many were expected 
to have been received? Perhaps
About 1930, equal to the No. 
 of strings gTLDs
Issue 3
How many supplementary PICs
Were submitted by applicants? No 
Real statistics
Issue 4
Are there any typical or some 
typical PIC or PICs available?
Issue 5
What the meaning of term 
"typical PIC "in legal language?
Issue 6
Does a typical PIC, if any, could
cover the objectives of PIC in 
general legal terms?
I think we are hijacked by a 
question raised which would be 
Impractical to study and impractical
 to infer ant thing from that.
Now, should we not DROP the 
Question?
Regards
Kavouss
 

  

 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 12 Dec 2015, at 00:50, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei at adlercolvin.com> wrote:
> 
> How large is the universe of existing PICs?  Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?
>  
> Rosemary
>  
> Rosemary E. Fei
> Adler & Colvin
> 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> 415/421-7555 (phone)
> 415/421-0712 (fax)
> rfei at adlercolvin.com 
> www.adlercolvin.com
>  
> _____________________________
> Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.
>  
> From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm at linx.net] 
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM
> To: Holly Gregory
> Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff at icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract
>  
>  
> 
> On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com> wrote:
> 
> We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included.  Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?
>  
> And therein lies the rub.
>  
> I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement. 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151212/e5966f25/attachment.html>