[CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All
I forgot  two more issue
Issue 7
How many more PICs we 
will receive  in future round? And
What would be the impact of those 
future  PICs on the potential study, 
if we agree to do?
Regards
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

> On 12 Dec 2015, at 09:23, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Rosemary,
> Dear Leon
> Dear All,
> Before certifying question to be 
> studied , one need to verify the 
> practicality and workability of the 
> study.
> Issue 1 
> How many PICs have been 
> received? Perhaps some 500
> Issue 2
> How many were expected 
> to have been received? Perhaps
> About 1930, equal to the No. 
>  of strings gTLDs
> Issue 3
> How many supplementary PICs
> Were submitted by applicants? No 
> Real statistics
> Issue 4
> Are there any typical or some 
> typical PIC or PICs available?
> Issue 5
> What the meaning of term 
> "typical PIC "in legal language?
> Issue 6
> Does a typical PIC, if any, could
> cover the objectives of PIC in 
> general legal terms?
> I think we are hijacked by a 
> question raised which would be 
> Impractical to study and impractical
>  to infer ant thing from that.
> Now, should we not DROP the 
> Question?
> Regards
> Kavouss
>  
> 
>   
> 
>  
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 12 Dec 2015, at 00:50, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei at adlercolvin.com> wrote:
>> 
>> How large is the universe of existing PICs?  Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?
>>  
>> Rosemary
>>  
>> Rosemary E. Fei
>> Adler & Colvin
>> 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
>> San Francisco, CA 94104
>> 415/421-7555 (phone)
>> 415/421-0712 (fax)
>> rfei at adlercolvin.com 
>> www.adlercolvin.com
>>  
>> _____________________________
>> Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.
>>  
>> From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm at linx.net] 
>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM
>> To: Holly Gregory
>> Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff at icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included.  Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?
>>  
>> And therein lies the rub.
>>  
>> I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151212/386695bd/attachment-0001.html>