[CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

[Mueller, Milton L]

Bruce, according to the CCWG charter, any determination by the board that a CCWG recommendation is “not in the public interest” requires a 2/3 majority of the board. Your comments contain 2 or 3 items which the board deems not in the “public interest.” Yet, as far as I can tell, no record of a vote is available. In order to verify that the board has actually passed its threshold, please provide a tally of the voting board members on each of those 3 items:

1.       Inspection rights

2.       Mission statement

3.       Human rights

Thanks,

--MM

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 5:49 AM
To: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

Hello Jordan,

Thanks for posting to the list.

The comments are also available in the public comment forum at:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00011.html

We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec.      That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec.   All dates are relative to my time zone ☺

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151214/4d68b95a/attachment.html>