[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Tue Dec 15 15:11:21 UTC 2015
Since the Board acknowledges in its comments that there is currently no legal definition of “global public interest” the only reasonable answer to this question is “the judgment of 2/3rd of the Board.” To which I would respond that the “judgment of the CCWG-A” reflecting a rough consensus of the community is a far better judge of what is in the global public interest than the what 2/3rd of the Board say …. Indeed, the exercise of the Board’s “big foot” veto on GPI grounds is a textbook example of why greater accountability is needed.
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9> Link to my PGP Key
<http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>
From: Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 2:47 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
Dear Bruce,
Thank you again for providing our group with the Board comment.
As raised in the CCWG call today, we are kindly requesting if the Board could provide our group with a response to the following question.
What are the legal basis and criteria by which the Board considers a given Recommendation to be contrary to the Global Public Interest ?
Clarification would really be useful to help our group, but also the Chartering Organizations, to check our own recommendations.
Thank you for sharing this email with the Board, and happy to expand on the question if need be.
Best,
Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
Co-chairs
De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Bruce Tonkin
Envoyé : lundi 14 décembre 2015 11:49
À : Accountability Cross Community
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
Hello Jordan,
Thanks for posting to the list.
The comments are also available in the public comment forum at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00011.html
We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec. That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec. All dates are relative to my time zone :)
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151215/e3d81f1e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2849 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151215/e3d81f1e/image001-0001.png>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list