[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
Mathieu Weill
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Tue Dec 15 16:35:40 UTC 2015
Dear Anne,
I am drawing your attention to the webinar FAQ where our lawyers have
provided additional details to your questions (page 3 and 4, questions 8 to
12).
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56984258/Webinar%20-%20Final%20Q%26A%20-%202%20Dec.pdf?version=1
<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56984258/Webinar%20-%20Final%20Q%26A%20-%202%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1450173637000&api=v2>
&modificationDate=1450173637000&api=v2
In light of this additional material and the responses provided in this
thread I would like to confirm that we have sufficient legal input.
My impression is that the question then becomes, for the CCWG itself,
whether the pre-service letters are perceived by the group as a useful extra
measure to implement the power, and I noted that ALAC (in Alan’s post
earlier to our last call) was suggesting the same.
Best
Mathieu
De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de
Rosemary E. Fei
Envoyé : mardi 15 décembre 2015 01:41
À : Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Holly Gregory; 'Steve DelBianco'
Cc : accountability-cross-community at icann.org; 'Gomes, Chuck'
(cgomes at verisign.com); Sidley ICANN CCWG; ipc_accountabilityct at icann.org;
ICANN-Adler
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
Questions 1 and 2 might be re-directed at whether a director can be
enforceably bound to an agreement not to bring such suits or seek such
relief, such as in a pre-service letter, rather than (or in addition to)
researching whether such suits and relief are possible. To Anne’s point,
claims without any legal basis can still be made in court, so perhaps the
focus should be on how quickly and easily they will be dismissed. An
enforceable agreement would go a long way in that direction, which would be
reassuring for SO/AC actors, but also a strong disincentive for directors
being removed to bring a claim at all.
The last question could be directed to ICANN’s insurance carrier, or other
carriers who may offer such coverage, rather than legal counsel. We can do
the research if directed, but I don’t think our legal expertise is needed to
be able to do that work.
Rosemary
Rosemary E. Fei
Adler & Colvin
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
San Francisco, CA 94104
415/421-7555 (phone)
415/421-0712 (fax)
rfei at adlercolvin.com
www.adlercolvin.com
Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and
County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print
this email.
From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 12:29 PM
To: Holly Gregory; 'Steve DelBianco'
Cc: gregshatanipc at gmail.com; 'Phil Corwin'; cwilson at 21cf.com; Rosemary E.
Fei; Thomas Rickert; ipc_accountabilityct at icann.org; 'Gomes, Chuck'
(cgomes at verisign.com); Rosemary E. Fei; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler;
accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: RE: CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
If the Chairs want to certify the legal questions, I think these would be:
1. Is it possible for a Director to bring suit for libel, slander, or
other causes of action during the community enforcement removal process or
thereafter based on the “written justification” laid out by the SO/AC and/or
oral statements made during the required conference calls in the Community
enforcement process?
2. Could a Director seek injunctive and/or declaratory relief to
interrupt the community enforcement process toward removal? If so, would
SOs/ACs and officers who are sued be required to mount their own defense?
How expensive would this be?
3. Is there insurance coverage available for SOs/ACs and their
officers in relation to possible suit by a director in jeopardy of being
removed or who has been removed from the Board? If so, how expensive is it?
These are not questions about how likely the action is to occur. That
does not really figure into the “chilling effect” that is of concern when
the officer of an SO or AC is drafting the “written justification” and/or
encouraging open discussion in the required (and recorded for posterity)
conference call.
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman at lrrlaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
From: Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:14 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Steve DelBianco'
Cc: gregshatanipc at gmail.com; 'Phil Corwin'; cwilson at 21cf.com; Rosemary Fei
(rfei at adlercolvin.com); Thomas Rickert; ipc_accountabilityct at icann.org;
'Gomes, Chuck' (cgomes at verisign.com); Rosemary Fei (rfei at adlercolvin.com);
Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN at adlercolvin.com
Subject: RE: CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
We must await further direction from the co-chairs whether this is something
that they would like research on under California law
HOLLY GREGORY
Partner
Sidley Austin LLP
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory at sidley.com
From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 3:03 PM
To: Gregory, Holly; 'Steve DelBianco'
Cc: gregshatanipc at gmail.com; 'Phil Corwin'; cwilson at 21cf.com; Rosemary Fei
(rfei at adlercolvin.com); Thomas Rickert; ipc_accountabilityct at icann.org;
'Gomes, Chuck' (cgomes at verisign.com)
Subject: RE: CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
Holly – I would tend to agree if in fact the SO or AC could remove a
director without cause and did not have to state its reasons, but the
community process requires this and it is discussed fully throughout four
steps of the Community process to director removal. The SO or AC must
state “written justification”, to which the Board has now added its “Clear
Rationale” comment.
One need only look at the differences of opinion that arose with respect to
.africa to understand that a stated reason for removal which has a “written
justification” or Clear Rationale from the SO/AC standpoint could easily
form the basis of a suit by a director. It does not require much by way of
theory for a plaintiff’s lawyer to allege claims of libel and even
irreparable harm. The SO/AC would likely need legal advice just to draft
the “written justification.”
Again, I do not think indemnification represents a reasonable risk to ICANN
as a corporation. The risk should be limited by contract when directors take
office. Directors should not be suing the SO/AC and/or its officers for
removal. Otherwise, the ultimate enforcement mechanism in the Sole
Designator Model is not effective.
You may not have seen this fact situation occur. That does not mean it
would not occur at ICANN. We have some fairly feisty folks in our midst.
The risk of suit is of course much higher than the risk of success on the
merits. I would say it is hard to measure in dollars the potential damage
to an individual associated with being removed from the ICANN Board with
“written justification”. It could be a pretty good strategy for a
director who wants to interrupt the Community Enforcement process. He or
she may also have the full support of other Directors willing to testify.
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman at lrrlaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lrrlaw.com_&d=CwMGaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=-r-X1vqLqfFo7wDtSJ7AQkHOsUyJczd-GcHxg4tVr_4&s=vqBDgdI1aOR4vc8v3l4jKLsfuSCdEocU8QaPE3RstAA&e=>
From: Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Steve DelBianco'
Cc: gregshatanipc at gmail.com; 'Phil Corwin'; cwilson at 21cf.com; Rosemary Fei
(rfei at adlercolvin.com); Thomas Rickert
Subject: RE: CCWG - ACCT - Recommendation 4 - Community Powers
Anne, My sense is that the concerns you raise present an extremely low risk
of suit – and hence low risk of indemnification and cost of
indemnification. In my many years of corporate governance practice I cannot
recall a lawsuit for libel or defamation by a director in an instance of
removal. But we can research under California law if the co-chairs certify.
Also, I am not aware of any theory of libel or defamation that would give
rise to injunctive relief delaying such removal where the designator has the
right to remove with or without cause as here. Again, we have not researched
this specific point under California law but will do so if certified. Holly
HOLLY GREGORY
Partner
Sidley Austin LLP
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory at sidley.com
f the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
_____
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151215/3715b979/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151215/3715b979/image001-0001.gif>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list