[CCWG-ACCT] Our timetable -- some personal observations

[James Gannon]

I fully agree with Malcom here. And think personally that yes we have reached that point. Thank you Malcom for summarising the situation in a very similar light to my own personal views.

-James




On 16/12/2015, 10:22 a.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Malcolm Hutty" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of malcolm at linx.net> wrote:

>I think sooner or later we must reach that point, and if the Chairs say
>that we reached it with publication of the Third Draft Report I will
>accept their judgement.
>
>If that is where we are, then the correct approach to the Board's
>substantial disagreements with core aspects of our proposal is simply to
>proceed on our current path: we convey our report to the Chartering
>Organisations and, with their support, deliver it to the Board as the
>final, considered community view. If the Board chooses to reject the
>community view, that's on them. The Board may back down, and support our
>proposal. And it may not, in which case it will be up to the NTIA to
>decide whether it agrees with us (and demands cooperaion from a
>recalcitrant Board) or with the Board (and so concludes that this
>community is not sufficient mature to be able to accept transition).