[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
Christopher Wilkinson
lists at christopherwilkinson.eu
Wed Dec 16 22:37:05 UTC 2015
Agree with Avri here: ICANN is responsible for several regulatory aspects of the DNS market, and should do so.
> it is not a content regulator
That does not exclude normal regulatory aspects.
CW
On 16 Dec 2015, at 20:23, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 16-Dec-15 05:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>> (2) ICANN is not a regulator, and does not regulate content through these contracts.
>
> doesn't this just mean it is not a content regulator without indicating
> that it is not a regulator in any other aspect of the role?
>
> avri
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list