[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

[Christopher Wilkinson]

Agree with Avri here: ICANN is responsible for several regulatory aspects of the DNS market, and should do so.

>  it is not a content regulator 

That does not exclude normal regulatory aspects.

CW


On 16 Dec 2015, at 20:23, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 16-Dec-15 05:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>> (2) ICANN is not a regulator, and does not regulate content through these contracts.
> 
> doesn't this just mean it is not a content regulator without indicating
> that it is not a regulator in any other aspect of the role?
> 
> avri
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community