[CCWG-ACCT] FW: FY16 Appropriations Act Extends IANA Transition Freeze without DOTCOM Act

[Nigel Roberts]

What I find interesting is that this law prevents NTIA spending out of 
this appropriation on the transition.

So whence come the funds for the expenditure it IS making on the 
transition work? Some other budget?

On 17/12/15 00:56, Phil Corwin wrote:
> NTIA can continue to prepare for the transition, including leading an
> interagency review of any Proposal it receives from ICANN. But it is
> prohibited from actually effecting the transition until October 1, 2016.
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172/cell***
>
> **
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
> */"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey/*
>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Greg Shatan
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2015 5:07 PM
> *To:* Jordan Carter
> *Cc:* Accountability Cross Community
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: FY16 Appropriations Act Extends IANA
> Transition Freeze without DOTCOM Act
>
> As I read this, it does not slow anything down.  We were targeting a
> transition around September 30, 2015 in any event.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>> wrote:
>
> Hi all, hi Milton,
>
> My understanding of the steps in the timetable was that finalising our
> proposal in January was what gave space for a transition in September at
> the earliest.
>
> Are you suggesting that instead it means one of the earlier steps can't
> start when it was intended?
>
> I.e. If NTIA could not start its consideration until 30 Sep then that
> does materially change things, timing wise. But if it could still do its
> review as part of preparing for a transition, then that wouldn't.
>
> Maybe we could ask NTIA for their view of the situation too?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jordan
>
>
> On Thursday, 17 December 2015, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu
> <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>
> This is good news, and I hope the co-chairs of the CCWG all sit down and
> read former Congressman Boucher's message out loud - better yet, sing it
> to the tune of Jingle Bells! - together. The idea that we have to
> truncate our process and twist ourselves into pretzels or cave to
> unreasonable demands from the board in order to meet an arbitrary
> schedule is now, I think, officially dead.
> --MM
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > It's also noteworthy that (b) has been added saying that the
> restriction shall
>  > not apply in fiscal year 2017. That's a nice statement of intention
> by the
>  > drafters of this provision that by the commencement of fiscal year
> 2017 in
>  > October of next year the transition will be complete.
>  >
>  > I don't believe that the adoption of this language in any way
> reflects a stepping
>  > back by Congress from the bipartisan consensus which has now been formed
>  > in both the House and the Senate to support the IANA transition as
> long as the
>  > NTIA’s originally announced 4 principles for ICANN accountability are
> in place
>  > and are enforceable as part of the transition plan.
>  >
>  > Please let me know if you have questions.
>  >
>  > Rick
>  >
>  > SEC. 539. (a) None of the funds made available by
>  > 21 this Act may be used to relinquish the responsibility of
>  > 22 the National Telecommunications and Information Ad ministration,
> during
>  > fiscal year 2016, with respect to
>  > 24 Internet domain name system functions, including respon-
>  > 1 sibility with respect to the authoritative root zone file and
>  > 2 the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority functions.
>  > 3 (b) Nothwithstanding any other law, subsection (a)
>  > 4 of this section shall not apply in fiscal year 2017.
>  >
>  >
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
> Chief Executive, InternetNZ
>
> +64-21-442-649 <tel:%2B64-21-442-649> | jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
>
> Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4477/11098 - Release Date: 12/01/15
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>