[CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

Bruce Tonkin Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Thu Dec 17 11:03:36 UTC 2015


Hello Malcolm,


>>  If we split "Mission" into two parts, "Mission" and "Scope", are you content that all the corresponding changes are made so that the effect remains the same. i.e. The Bylaws say that the Scope is limited, that ICANN may not act outside the Scope, and that part of the IRP's job is to ajudicate on whether it has done so (and stop it from doing so), and all this also be part of Fundamental Bylaws?

Agreed.   The scope is part of the fundamental bylaws and would be subject to IRP.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
 



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list