[CCWG-ACCT] TR: Board Briefing + Q&A to SO-AC-SG-C-RALO Leaders - 17 Dec 13:00 UTC

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Co-Chairs
Still you referred to early January to receive formal reply from chartering
organisations
As I mentioned several time , dead line for chartering organization to send
formal reply would be 21 January after they recieve the collections of the
public comments prepared by ICANN Secretarait.
Pls and pls kindly do not push more necessary.
sOME ,IF NOT ALL  chartering organisation CAN NOT SEND THEIR FORMAL REPLY
before 21 January as they must read the public comments first.
However, some chartering organisation and any individual within those
chartering organisation could send their comment ( formal or informal )
before 21 January 2016 without waiting for public comments . That is up to
them to decide
Regards
Kavouss

2015-12-17 13:19 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As announced in our call, a Board briefing is organized today regarding
> their comment to our Draft report, and none of the co chairs was able to
> attend.
>
> We have shared the following written input with the  group of SO-AC-SG-RALO
> and thought it might be useful to the group as well.
>
> Best
> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr]
> Envoyé : jeudi 17 décembre 2015 13:15
> Objet : RE: Board Briefing + Q&A to SO-AC-SG-C-RALO Leaders - 17 Dec 13:00
> UTC
>
> All,
>
> As none of the CCWG co chairs can attend this briefing, the following is a
> quick update from us.
>
> There have been questions with respect to the next steps for the work of
> the
> CCWG. The questions were asked particularly in the light of the comments on
> our third report by the ICANN Board.
>
> Firstly, we would like to express our appreciation for the Board's
> thoughtful contributions and the efforts that were put into a comprehensive
> comment on numerous aspects of our report. As mentioned during the CCWG
> call
> earlier this week, the Board comments will be analyzed as other comments
> from Chartering Organizations and the community.
>
> Thus, the CCWG has not changed its approach to the next steps that need to
> be taken. Our report remains to be the basis for comments.
>
> As we previously announced, the CCWG is now awaiting feedback from the
> Chartering Organizations to then assess whether a supplemental draft will
> be
> required. Additionally, the CCWG will assess whether comments require the
> group to make changes to its recommendations and proactively reach out to
> the Chartering Organizations. We are reiterating this point to confirm to
> the Chartering Organizations that their potential statements of support
> will
> not extend to potential future changes that substantially change the
> recommendations.
>
> While we have asked the Chartering Oranizations to respond by December
> 21st,
> we know that some organizations need a few more days to provide feedback.
> Thus, we expect an assessment of all input to be conducted early January.
> It
> will be at that point in time when a decision on the requirement of a
> supplemental draft will be made.
>
> Finally, we would like to remind everyone that comments were requested
> particularly with respect to support or rejection of the CCWG
> recommendations. Issues or recommendations that relate to the
> implementation
> of these, shall be discussed an taken into consideration at a later stage.
> It is our impression that the issues raised by should be dealt with and at
> that stage.
>
> Best regards and have a fruitful call,
> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
> CCWG co-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151217/6445e18a/attachment.html>