[CCWG-ACCT] Our timetable -- some personal observations

Bruce Tonkin Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Fri Dec 18 11:01:47 UTC 2015


Hello Izumi,


>>  It would be helpful to know how strongly the ICANN Board feels about some of the suggestions the Board has made in the public comment, to have them reflected in the final CCWG proposal.

We have made several suggestions for improvements, and we hope all suggestions will be considered along with other public comments.

The areas of particular concern for the Board are:

- appropriately drafting of inspection rights in the bylaws   (recommendation 1)

- ensuring that the users of the IANA function are involved in any veto of the portion of the ICANN budget allocated to operating the IANA function (recommendation 4)

- appropriate drafting of the mission and scope of responsibilities in the bylaws  (recommendation 5)

- getting a statement and framework for human rights right before incorporating text into the bylaws  (recommendation 6) - I expect that can be done prior to transition as part of work stream 2

- using the same methodology for approving recommendations from work stream 2 as work stream 1 (recommendation 12)

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin 



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list