[CCWG-ACCT] Does the proposed change to the GAC Bylaw create a new "mandatory voting requirement" for the ICANN Board?
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Dec 19 20:41:32 UTC 2015
I will try again. What I am saying is just a mathematical truth.
I a Bylaw says that to REJECT something (whether it is GAC Advice or
a GNSO PDP Recommendation or where to go have dinner) at least 2/3 of
the Board must reject. That is, 1/3 or less of the Board opt to
accept. If the Board does NOT reject, then it means that less that
2/3 voted to reject. That is mathematically identical to greater than
1/3 accepts, sine the total must be 1.
Alan
At 19/12/2015 03:39 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>Alan
>I do not clearly understand your argument in saying " if a given
>issue required 2/3 majority to be rejected by the Board, then to
>accept the same issue, the Board requires 1/3 vote "
>There is no logic in that example?
>Regards
>Kavouss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151219/fed33a44/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list