[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January

Fri Dec 25 11:46:55 UTC 2015

Dear All,

Once again the ICANN Process is or should be a democratic one.

No one could impose his or her views on the others.

Intensive 8 times each 3 hours call may not be efficient due to the fact
that a) our experience of last two time three hours call is negative as the
last hour was really boring ,b) there should be sufficient time to reflect
and act on the actions requested7 agreed at each call and c) there should
be a firm commitment from ICANN representative to actively participate in  the
discussion and  negotiation manner and bring compromise proposals after
each  with a view to reach a general agreement on all comments A) from
public and B)from ICANN.

Once agreement reached, it is not expected that ICANN Board again make a
counter proposal to NTIA when it submit the Final proposal to that
Organization.

Consequently:
1. We need to put the number of calls foreseen to be held in January and
their corresponding duration to doodle reply .If the majority of commenters
agree to 8 calls each 3 hours then we proceed if not the Co-Chair should
examine the replies and act accordingly

2. Asking ICANN Board to a) designate it’s formally authorized
representative(s) to discuss and negotiate with the CCWG on their concerns

3. It should be emphasized that ,if all concerns were discussed, negotiated
and compromises were emerged, ICANN undertake not maker another surprise
and commenting again on the compromise emerged when it submits CCWG
proposal to NTIA due to the fact that either somebody is involved in the
negotiations and respects the results, or CCWG does not take into account
the ICANN Board’s proposals at all when it consider the public comments and
then ICANN could send its comments to NIA on the final CCWG proposal.

ICANN Board should opt for any of the two alternatives. We should close the
Pandora BOX.

Regards

Kavouss   .

2015-12-25 1:41 GMT+01:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:

> Hi,
>
> I think the intensive schedule is necessary and we will find a way if we
> want to have any chance of succeeding with an IANA Transition in 2016.
>
> I also think 3hr meetings are ok.   We might even consider one or more
> of those remote weekends of meetings when they do not interfere with
> people's work.
>
> avri
>
> On 24-Dec-15 06:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> > Dear Mathieu
> > Thank you for your suggestion
> > As I told you at various occations, human being mental capacity should
> > not be overloaded.
> > I have participated in many conference calls since years.
> > Any call which lasts more than two hours was totally inefficient
> > Pls then reduce the duration to maximum two hours
> > Regards
> > Kavouss
> >
> > 2015-12-24 12:25 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net
> > <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>:
> >
> >     I don’t forsee anyone who is not being compensated for their work
> >     being able to dedicate 6 hours from a working week to this, I
> >     object to rushing things and designing schedules which are
> >     unrealistic IMO.
> >
> >     -Jg
> >
> >     From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> >     <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>> on
> >     behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> >     <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
> >     Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 11:22 a.m.
> >     To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
> >     <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> >     <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
> >     Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January
> >
> >     Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> >
> >     In line with the work plan discussion held on call #72, we wish to
> >     inform you that we have decided to increase the number of calls
> >     per week to two to allow for an in-depth analysis of the input
> >     received on our Draft Proposal, and discuss any complex requests
> >     for change there may be. It is currently foreseen that this
> >     frequency of calls will only apply to the month of January.
> >
> >
> >
> >     As discussed on 22 December, these calls will be plenary and
> >     topic-based. You will receive a list of topics in advance of the
> >     meetings so that you may plan your participation accordingly.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Duration of the calls will also be extended to 3 hours to allow
> >     for ample time to complete our tasks. Calls will be cancelled
> >     (and/or duration will be reduced) if deemed unnecessary.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Please note that staff will send invites as well as overview of
> >     the conference call calendar shortly.
> >
> >
> >
> >     We look forward to reconvening in January and wish you a happy
> >     holiday season for those of you who celebrate.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Best regards
> >
> >     Mathieu – Thomas - León
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151225/89a05875/attachment.html>