[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

[Avri Doria]

If left to the GAC, GPI becomes the intersection of National Public
Interests, i.e. their consensus point.  And if they are the only ones
concerning themselves with GPI as opposed to it being one of the
strategic priorities for ICANN as a whole then that is all we have to
work on.

avri

On 26-Dec-15 13:20, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Not really wanting to wade into ICANN 's (ab)use of whatever GPI is to
> further their interests, but I don't think it is the sum of National
> Interests.
>
> el
>
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s
>
> On 26 Dec 2015, 19:27 +0200, Kavouss Arasteh
> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>, wrote:
>> Avri,
>> GPI is not limited to HR.
>> Any description of GPI will be subject to challenge due to the fact
>> that GPI is a cumulative of national/nation PI which varies From
>> country to country snd culture to culture.
>> Regards
>> Kavousd
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus