[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January
Chartier, Mike S
mike.s.chartier at intel.com
Tue Dec 29 18:26:44 UTC 2015
Avri,
I'm a little confused. What do you mean by "they should decide on those issues"?
Mike
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not into rushing.
> And certainly not into rushing for rushing sake.
>
> But we have committed ourselves to getting the work done and we have a
> world of people waiting for us to make and end of it. We have been
> slipping our schedule. While the reasons for slipping the schedule may
> be legitimate (not always certain of that) it does not mean we haven't
> slipped on promises. We continue to slip. I think this commits us to do
> our best to just keep putting one foot in front of the other and
> continuing to do our best to get the work done. That is not done by
> taking a leisurely time, but is one the aided by focusing on the work
> intensively.
>
> I still think we should be considering intensive online working weekends.
>
> I also think it may be time for the members among us (I am not one) to
> do some deciding on the issues where we still do not have full
> consensus. For example, if at the end of the intense work period in
> January we are still arguing about some details, they should decide on
> those issues, we should document that fact, and move on.
>
> avri
>
>> On 29-Dec-15 12:15, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> Yes
>> Some people rush and rush.
>> In some of the working party meeting in the past there was about 10 participant since others could not afford that.
>> Multiplication if meetings and extension of their duration does not always have good results.
>> We need good plan,good preparation and advance working document and establishment of priorities
>> Kavousd
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 25 Dec 2015, at 01:41, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the intensive schedule is necessary and we will find a way if we
>>> want to have any chance of succeeding with an IANA Transition in 2016.
>>>
>>> I also think 3hr meetings are ok. We might even consider one or more
>>> of those remote weekends of meetings when they do not interfere with
>>> people's work.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>> On 24-Dec-15 06:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>>> Dear Mathieu
>>>> Thank you for your suggestion
>>>> As I told you at various occations, human being mental capacity should
>>>> not be overloaded.
>>>> I have participated in many conference calls since years.
>>>> Any call which lasts more than two hours was totally inefficient
>>>> Pls then reduce the duration to maximum two hours
>>>> Regards
>>>> Kavouss
>>>>
>>>> 2015-12-24 12:25 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net
>>>> <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>:
>>>>
>>>> I don’t forsee anyone who is not being compensated for their work
>>>> being able to dedicate 6 hours from a working week to this, I
>>>> object to rushing things and designing schedules which are
>>>> unrealistic IMO.
>>>>
>>>> -Jg
>>>>
>>>> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>> on
>>>> behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>>>> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
>>>> Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 11:22 a.m.
>>>> To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
>>>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>>>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January
>>>>
>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In line with the work plan discussion held on call #72, we wish to
>>>> inform you that we have decided to increase the number of calls
>>>> per week to two to allow for an in-depth analysis of the input
>>>> received on our Draft Proposal, and discuss any complex requests
>>>> for change there may be. It is currently foreseen that this
>>>> frequency of calls will only apply to the month of January.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As discussed on 22 December, these calls will be plenary and
>>>> topic-based. You will receive a list of topics in advance of the
>>>> meetings so that you may plan your participation accordingly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Duration of the calls will also be extended to 3 hours to allow
>>>> for ample time to complete our tasks. Calls will be cancelled
>>>> (and/or duration will be reduced) if deemed unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that staff will send invites as well as overview of
>>>> the conference call calendar shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We look forward to reconvening in January and wish you a happy
>>>> holiday season for those of you who celebrate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Mathieu – Thomas - León
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list