[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Dec 29 20:17:32 UTC 2015 

I read the "they" as being the formally appointed CCWG Members, to whom the charter gives voting rights.

Alan 
-- 
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On December 29, 2015 1:26:44 PM EST, "Chartier, Mike S" <mike.s.chartier at intel.com> wrote:
>Avri,
>I'm a little confused. What do you mean by "they should decide on those
>issues"?
>
>Mike
>
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am not into rushing.
>> And certainly not into rushing for rushing sake.
>> 
>> But we have committed ourselves to getting the work done and we have
>a
>> world of people waiting for us to make and end of it. We have been
>> slipping our schedule.  While the reasons for slipping the schedule
>may
>> be legitimate  (not always certain of that) it does not mean we
>haven't
>> slipped on promises. We continue to slip.  I think this commits us to
>do
>> our best to just keep putting one foot in front of the other and
>> continuing to do our best to get the work done.  That is not done by
>> taking a leisurely time, but is one the aided by focusing on the work
>> intensively.
>> 
>> I still think we should be considering intensive online working
>weekends. 
>> 
>> I also think it may be time for the members among us (I am not one)
>to
>> do some deciding on the issues where we still do not have full
>> consensus.  For example, if at the end of the intense work period in
>> January we are still arguing about some details, they should decide
>on
>> those issues, we should document that fact, and move on.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>>> On 29-Dec-15 12:15, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>> Yes 
>>> Some people rush and rush.
>>> In some of the working party meeting in the past there was about 10
>participant since others could not afford that.
>>> Multiplication if meetings and extension of their duration does not
>always  have good results.
>>> We need good plan,good preparation and advance working document and
>establishment of priorities
>>> Kavousd
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On 25 Dec 2015, at 01:41, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I think the intensive schedule is necessary and we will find a way
>if we
>>>> want to have any chance of succeeding with an IANA Transition in
>2016.
>>>> 
>>>> I also think 3hr meetings are ok.   We might even consider one or
>more
>>>> of those remote weekends of meetings when they do not interfere
>with
>>>> people's work.
>>>> 
>>>> avri
>>>> 
>>>>> On 24-Dec-15 06:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>>>> Dear Mathieu
>>>>> Thank you for your suggestion
>>>>> As I told you at various occations, human being mental capacity
>should
>>>>> not be overloaded.
>>>>> I have participated in many conference calls since years.
>>>>> Any call which lasts more than two hours was totally inefficient
>>>>> Pls then reduce the duration to maximum two hours
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Kavouss
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2015-12-24 12:25 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net
>>>>> <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   I don’t forsee anyone who is not being compensated for their
>work
>>>>>   being able to dedicate 6 hours from a working week to this, I
>>>>>   object to rushing things and designing schedules which are
>>>>>   unrealistic IMO.
>>>>> 
>>>>>   -Jg
>>>>> 
>>>>>   From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>>>>>   <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>> on
>>>>>   behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>>>>>   <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
>>>>>   Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 11:22 a.m.
>>>>>   To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
>>>>>   <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>>>>   <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>>>>>   Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Dear Colleagues,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   In line with the work plan discussion held on call #72, we wish
>to
>>>>>   inform you that we have decided to increase the number of calls
>>>>>   per week to two to allow for an in-depth analysis of the input
>>>>>   received on our Draft Proposal, and discuss any complex requests
>>>>>   for change there may be. It is currently foreseen that this
>>>>>   frequency of calls will only apply to the month of January.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   As discussed on 22 December, these calls will be plenary and 
>>>>>   topic-based. You will receive a list of topics in advance of the
>>>>>   meetings so that you may plan your participation accordingly.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Duration of the calls will also be extended to 3 hours to allow
>>>>>   for ample time to complete our tasks. Calls will be cancelled
>>>>>   (and/or duration will be reduced) if deemed unnecessary. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Please note that staff will send invites as well as overview of
>>>>>   the conference call calendar shortly.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   We look forward to reconvening in January and wish you a happy
>>>>>   holiday season for those of you who celebrate.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Best regards
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Mathieu – Thomas - León
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>>   Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>>   Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>>   <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>>  
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>software.
>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151229/64b16683/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list