[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan in January

[Mathieu Weill]

Dear Chris, All,

I fully concur that an overarching agenda is a short term need, and needs a ccwg discussion. Our assumption is that this will be more relevant to discuss this once we have a summary of comments. Staff is working on it right now, and as soon as it is available, we will discuss this overarching agenda. 

Best,

Mathieu Weill
---------------
Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style

> Le 30 déc. 2015 à 12:28, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> Thanks for this. Do you have a proposed topic agenda yet. I won’t be able to make all the calls (and I expect others will be in the same boat) so it would helpful to have an overarching agenda for the calls as soon as possible. Apologies if this has been sent already and I have missed it.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
>> On 30 Dec 2015, at 20:50 , Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Kavouss, Dear Paul, All,
>> 
>> Some of you have raised concerns about the work plan and the decision to
>> schedule two calls a week, announced in my 24th December email.
>> 
>> Participants to our meeting #73 will remember that this issue was
>> discussed during that call
>> (https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56986612). Key
>> take away was the need for plenary discussions rather than multiplying
>> subgroups.
>> 
>> While we certainly recognize the different views expressed about the
>> timeline for delivering our final report, we are also trying to organize
>> our calls in a manner that enables inclusive and informed debate about the
>> comments received. 24 hours of calls in January "only" represent two hours
>> of discussions per recommendation (leaving aside other types of issues
>> that we dedicate time on during our calls). Two hours to fully understand
>> concerns and find a way forward that is acceptable to all.
>> 
>> We hope that, by using a topic based agenda and providing a thorough
>> analysis of the comments received ahead of the call, we can make the best
>> use of everyone's time during these calls, so that they can remain driven
>> by the willingness to understand each of the concerns in good faith and
>> find common ground, as we have demonstrated in the past that our group can
>> do.
>> 
>> If needed and desired within the group, we might have to rely on intensive
>> days (possibly on a week end) as some of you suggested, but we are aware
>> of the challenges of such an approach and would like to avoid that as much
>> as possible.
>> 
>> As a follow up to the discussion that took place during our meeting #73,
>> we will put these proposals for discussion during our next meeting, on
>> January 5th, and look forward to your further contributions and
>> suggestions.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Leon, Thomas & Mathieu
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151230/26b7b01b/attachment.html>