[CCWG-ACCT] got some lawyerly answers on membership structure
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.na
Thu Jan 29 16:17:06 UTC 2015
James,
the "failed" refers to Chris' suggestion that the ccNSO can set policy
successfully.
And I stand by this.
el
On 2015-01-29 17:54 , James M. Bladel wrote:
> Hi Eberhard:
>
> To your point here:
> "that may be so, though I disagree, again because it does not work for
> the non-members of the ccNSO, it does not address the bilateral
> relationship, and, more importantly it has failed. “
>
> I don’t think “failed” is the right term, versus “doesn’t go far enough”
> or “is incomplete.” If a proposal were to be an improvement for all
> SO/ACs, -except- the ccNSO, and (also importantly) it does not create
> harm or exacerbate existing problems, then I think we should not reject
> it, but consider it part of the solution package and keep working.
>
> Thanks—
>
> J.
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list