[CCWG-ACCT] Who is managing the lawyers and what have they beenasked to do?
nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Jul 7 10:20:25 UTC 2015
At the moment I would not die in an ditch over a membership model or not.
As a proponent of democratic legitimacy I have a distinct preference for
the legitimacy that a grassroots membership model provides, but I am
open to persuausion by the proponents of either.
However, my understanding is that a membership model may not be
acceptable to the one stakeholder that really counts.
So is that true? And if so, how do we proceed?
On 07/07/15 11:12, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> while this may be true, or not, it most certainly describes that there
> was not consensus among the public comments.
> On 2015-07-06 21:04, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
>> Hmm. I think it’s important to bear in mind that there was
>> overwhelming consensus among the public comments to support the
>> membership model. The detractors from the model, while important
>> and perhaps critical, are not in the majority. I’m not sure
>> this process speaks to how we better use counsel as much as how we
>> achieve consensus on principles.
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community