[CCWG-ACCT] Redactions in ICANN documents
ceo at auda.org.au
Fri Jul 17 07:56:11 UTC 2015
I don’t believe much ‘convincing’ would be necessary el.
> On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:52 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
> I am wondering if we can perhaps convince ICANN to in the interim
> when they redact documents, to write something like "Redacted on
> request of ........" so that if we were to take ICANN staff by
> their word that they only redact because of transparency (!) we
> know at least which side they are on :-)-O
> greetings, el
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community