[CCWG-ACCT] Concept of some form of "independent" member

Bruce Tonkin Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Fri Jul 17 09:30:44 UTC 2015

Hello Greg,

>>  That bypasses the community structures entirely, as well as those communities that are not composed of legal persons.  For instance, all of those pesky non-contracted parties in the GNSO's Commercial Stakeholder Group and Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, and also the ALAC (and SSAC and RSSAC, for that matter).

>>  The "directly affected parties" language (and your list) tends to exclude these groups, but they cannot be excluded from the multistakeholder model or the community.

Yes – I wasn’t intending that contracts be a replacement to the powers given to the broader community in the bylaws.

I was just noting that in addition to the commitments in the bylaws you can also add the commitments into contracts as well.

Bruce Tonkin 

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list